|
|
Aguilera-Verdugo, J. J., Driencourt-Mangin, F., Hernandez-Pinto, R. J., Plenter, J., Ramirez-Uribe, S., Renteria-Olivo, A. E., et al. (2020). Open Loop Amplitudes and Causality to All Orders and Powers from the Loop-Tree Duality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(21), 211602–6pp.
Abstract: Multiloop scattering amplitudes describing the quantum fluctuations at high-energy scattering processes are the main bottleneck in perturbative quantum field theory. The loop-tree duality is a novel method aimed at overcoming this bottleneck by opening the loop amplitudes into trees and combining them at integrand level with the real-emission matrix elements. In this Letter, we generalize the loop-tree duality to all orders in the perturbative expansion by using the complex Lorentz-covariant prescription of the original one-loop formulation. We introduce a series of mutiloop topologies with arbitrary internal configurations and derive very compact and factorizable expressions of their open-to-trees representation in the loop-tree duality formalism. Furthermore, these expressions are entirely independent at integrand level of the initial assignments of momentum flows in the Feynman representation and remarkably free of noncausal singularities. These properties, that we conjecture to hold to other topologies at all orders, provide integrand representations of scattering amplitudes that exhibit manifest causal singular structures and better numerical stability than in other representations.
|
|
|
|
Driencourt-Mangin, F., Rodrigo, G., Sborlini, G. F. R., & Torres Bobadilla, W. J. (2022). Interplay between the loop-tree duality and helicity amplitudes. Phys. Rev. D, 105(1), 016012–13pp.
Abstract: The spinor-helicity formalism has proven to be very efficient in the calculation of scattering amplitudes in quantum field theory, while the loop-tree duality (LTD) representation of multiloop integrals exhibits appealing and interesting advantages with respect to other approaches. In view of the most recent developments in LTD, we exploit the synergies with the spinor-helicity formalism to analyze illustrative one- and two-loop scattering processes. We focus our discussion on the local UV renormalization of IR and UV finite helicity amplitudes and present a fully automated numerical implementation that provides efficient expressions, which are integrable directly in four space-time dimensions.
|
|
|
|
Torres Bobadilla, W. J. et al, Driencourt-Mangin, F., & Rodrigo, G. (2021). May the four be with you: novel IR-subtraction methods to tackle NNLO calculations. Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(3), 250–61pp.
Abstract: In this manuscript, we report the outcome of the topical workshop: paving the way to alternative NNLO strategies (https://indico.ific.uv.es/e/WorkStop-ThinkStart_3.0), by presenting a discussion about different frameworks to perform precise higher-order computations for high-energy physics. These approaches implement novel strategies to deal with infrared and ultraviolet singularities in quantum field theories. A special emphasis is devoted to the local cancellation of these singularities, which can enhance the efficiency of computations and lead to discover novel mathematical properties in quantum field theories.
|
|
|
|
Banerjee, P., Carloni Calame, C. M., Chiesa, M., Di Vita, S., Engel, T., Fael, M., et al. (2020). Theory for muon-electron scattering @ 10 ppm: A report of the MUonE theory initiative. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(6), 591–23pp.
Abstract: We review the current status of the theory predictions for elastic μ-e scattering, describing the recent activities and future plans of the theory initiative related to the proposed MUonE experiment.
|
|
|
|
Gnendiger, C., Signer, A., Stockinger, D., Broggio, A., Cherchiglia, A. L., Driencourt-Mangin, F., et al. (2017). To d, or not to d: recent developments and comparisons of regularization schemes. Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(7), 471–39pp.
Abstract: We give an introduction to several regularization schemes that deal with ultraviolet and infrared singularities appearing in higher-order computations in quantum field theories. Comparing the computation of simple quantities in the various schemes, we point out similarities and differences between them.
|
|
