PT Journal AU ATLAS Collaboration (Aad, Gea Aikot, A Amos, KR Aparisi Pozo, JA Bailey, AJ Bouchhar, N Cabrera Urban, S Cantero, J Cardillo, F Castillo Gimenez, V Chitishvili, M Costa, MJ Didenko, M Escobar, C Fiorini, L Fullana Torregrosa, E Fuster, J Garcia, C Garcia Navarro, JE Gomez Delegido, AJ Gonzalez de la Hoz, S Gonzalvo Rodriguez, GR Guerrero Rojas, JGR Lacasta, C Marti-Garcia, S Martinez Agullo, P Miralles Lopez, M Mitsou, VA Monsonis Romero, L Moreno Llacer, M Munoz Perez, D Navarro-Gonzalez, J Poveda, J Prades Ibañez, A Rubio Jimenez, A Ruiz-Martinez, A Sabatini, P Saibel, A Salt, J Sanchez Sebastian, V Sayago Galvan, I Senthilkumar, V Soldevila, U Sanchez, J Torro Pastor, E Valero, A Valiente Moreno, E Valls Ferrer, JA Varriale, L Villaplana Perez, M Vos, M TI Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using LHC Run 2 data SO Journal of Instrumentation JI J. Instrum. PY 2024 BP P02009 - 58pp VL 19 IS 2 DI 10.1088/1748-0221/19/02/P02009 LA English DE Calorimeter methods; Pattern recognition; cluster finding; calibration and fitting methods; Performance of High Energy Physics Detectors AB This paper presents the electron and photon energy calibration obtained with the ATLAS detector using 140 fb-1 of LHC proton -proton collision data recorded at -Js = 13 TeV between 2015 and 2018. Methods for the measurement of electron and photon energies are outlined, along with the current knowledge of the passive material in front of the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter. The energy calibration steps are discussed in detail, with emphasis on the improvements introduced in this paper. The absolute energy scale is set using a large sample of Z -boson decays into electron -positron pairs, and its residual dependence on the electron energy is used for the first time to further constrain systematic uncertainties. The achieved calibration uncertainties are typically 0.05% for electrons from resonant Z -boson decays, 0.4% at ET – 10 GeV, and 0.3% at ET – 1 TeV; for photons at ET <^>' 60 GeV, they are 0.2% on average. This is more than twice as precise as the previous calibration. The new energy calibration is validated using .11tfr -, ee and radiative Z -boson decays. ER